I tried a "new" prop Monday. Its a Performance 68x68, intended for a 150 or 160 HP RV-4. my son Peter got it with his RV-4 as a spare.
For me, with a stock T-18 'thin wing' O-290G with O-320E crank, Marvel MA4 and cheek cowl, I experienced a longer ground run and slower initial climb than the Ted Hendrickson 68x68 that I am refinishing.
The Hendrickson: Static 2250 RPM; 2600 RPM Max @ 179 TAS MPH 3000ft.
The Performance: Static 2160 RPM; 2580 RPM Max @ 177 TAS MPH 3000ft.
The Performance brand prop had increased to only 2200 RPM @ 120 IAS @ 1500ft MSL, but after that, the sluggish climb became a good climb as the speed increased, but still was a bit less than the Hendrickson. I don't fault the prop, as I said, it was for a more powerful O-320. The palm is wider in the working part of the blade than the Hedrickson.
What I did notice, is a harsh propeller beat, like the engine pulses are harder at the slightly lower RPM, not an out of ballance prop. Also, it tracks perfectly.
I believe it would serve very well on a dynafocal mounted O-320, but might run at full throttle above 2700 RPM, which is consistant with the RV-4s previous owner's statement. Something like it climbed great but was a bit slow at the top end.
This might be a great prop for a 150 HP RV-9, which Peter and his mom are building. So it looks like I'll have to give it back.