Thorp Air Command - T18.net http://t18.net/thorpforum/ |
|
motor mount http://t18.net/thorpforum/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=7559 |
Page 1 of 3 |
Author: | Fraser MacPhee [ Sun Mar 30, 2014 8:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: motor mount |
Lance - I know that's not a dynafocal mount, but those mounts look curiously like the set I just put on my dynafocal 0-320 https://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/ ... afocal.php |
Author: | lance38dt [ Sun Mar 30, 2014 8:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: motor mount |
Fraser MacPhee wrote: Lance - I know that's not a dynafocal mount, but those mounts look curiously like the set I just put on my dynafocal 0-320 https://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/ ... afocal.php thanks Fraser Im sure someone will recognize it appreciate the return. Thanks Lance |
Author: | dan [ Sun Mar 30, 2014 9:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: motor mount |
That is a conical mount, I have never seen Lords on a conical mount, but obviously I have learned somthing here. There are usually machined shoulder type washers used here, I have only machined up one set and that was for Deans plane they are lathed out of t-3 bar stock. Dean, Ira, can you guys shed some light on this, I can't remember what the Rubber element was that was used along with the washers........( IM old). Dan |
Author: | SHIPCHIEF [ Sun Mar 30, 2014 11:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: motor mount |
I don't think that's a conical mount. My T-18 'Feisty' has the same arrangement. O-290G mount ears are just drilled thru. It looks to me like those mount ears have not been bored out to the conical mount dimension. Some rubber biscuit, as yet unidentified is used. I have an other O-290G case that has been crudely bored to take the conical rubber pieces. (the 'training engine') I would like to know what it is, as 'Feisty' needs a set too. Yours look to have more sag, and less cracks than mine, but the same parts & arrangement, like they were built to the same plans. I didn't get plans when I bought 'Feisty' maybe some one with plans will look in theirs and find out. Bruce F has a set of plans, an O-290G on his T-18, and has recently removed & installed his engine. How 'bout it Bruce? Your lower picture shows a silver washer between the welded mount and the aluminum plate, I would guess added as a spacer to lift the front of the engine. Possibly to correct some sag in the rubber elements? It would be nice to find it's a reasonably price auto part. That wouldn't be a suprise, considering the enginuity of J.T. |
Author: | bfinney [ Mon Mar 31, 2014 12:58 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: motor mount |
The O290G did not have the cone machined in the mount ear just a 7/16" hole for the bolt and thus JT spec the dynafocal Lord mount for the isolation damper. If the rubber is not cracked or deteriorating I would rotate them 180 deg to remove the sag, else the following is copy from the thread "how to hang an engine" by Lee W <copy> This seems to be a recurring topic, there are several options for sandwich mounts the cheapest is the "homebuilders mounts" http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/e ... ndwich.php Rumor has it that these are simply the mounts that Lycoming ships their motors with ... regardless they seem to work fine for me. As John pointed out, (max) torque values are not unique to application each bolt size (in this case AN7) has it's specified torque value (in this case 450-500 in lbs). That being said and I know I've gotten in trouble for this in the past ... I prefer to use the "comfortably snug rule". I recently pulled N51863's motor and while I was at it I decided to change out the Lord mounts, I agree Frase .. there is no easy way! It requires patience, muscle and a lot of cussing! _________________ Lee Walton Houston, TX N51863,N118LW (under construction) KDWH </copy> Note the Aircraft Spruce parts referenced above is what I use several years ago when I replaced my mounts and are the parts as called out on the plans. |
Author: | SHIPCHIEF [ Mon Mar 31, 2014 4:06 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: motor mount |
Yikes! a set of Part # 08-03500 is about $450! Phraze' PN #08-03600 is $200 less, but a bit stiffer for acro? |
Author: | Bill Williams [ Mon Mar 31, 2014 5:23 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: motor mount |
This what I think I know. Drawing 479 specs Lord J7401-3 which is no longer available, I believe the replacement is J7402-5 and cost about $86.00 ea. |
Author: | Fraser MacPhee [ Mon Mar 31, 2014 8:44 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: motor mount |
I originally purchased the more expensive mounts, then ordered the ones I referenced and shipped the other more expensive ones back. Ideally, the torque values of an AN bolt (are supposed to) result in the nut bottoming at the end of the threads/beginning of the shank. FYI - When you start putting spacers into the setup to counter sag, the bolt length changes...YMMV. I broke 2 nails while re-hanging my engine.....my manicurist say Ho Lee Fook!! My thoughts on stiffness are these - I want stiff mounts (?)....ahem.....OK...anyway.... Higher durometer neoprene rubber (like the marketing department calls those ones I got for acro) should work great for any application. The harder the rubber the better, IMHO. |
Author: | jrevens [ Mon Mar 31, 2014 11:03 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: motor mount |
Fraser MacPhee wrote: ..... Ideally, the torque values of an AN bolt (are supposed to) result in the nut bottoming at the end of the threads/beginning of the shank..... I believe that "ideally" you should never have the nut "bottom out" at the end of the threads... how would you know you're there without damaging threads? Ideally about a washer thickness of threads should be left. Sorry for nit-picking, Frase... I know you know that. Can't help myself. |
Author: | Fraser MacPhee [ Mon Mar 31, 2014 2:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: motor mount |
Lance - clearly the smart and easiest thing to do is to remove and replace one at a time. In my case, the mounts were total trash and the new ones would just not fit - a cherry picker worked for one bolt, but then the next one would not fit no matter how hard I tried....so off it came and I started from scratch, and having to make a "bullet" out of some aluminum rod to hammer the effing sh....?...ahem...uh.... gently guide the last bolt through. John - right you are of course, I think it was an old wives tale from a browbeaten umpire and part time aircraft mechanic....perhaps stated more accurately.....if you exceed the recommended torque value of a "properly sized" AN bolt with properly sized washer, you risk bottoming out the threads and possibly damaging them, which may in turn potentially decrease the structural integrity of the aircraft, resulting in potential injury and possible loss of life.....>:D |
Author: | lance38dt [ Mon Mar 31, 2014 2:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: motor mount |
Fraser, I guess your saying try one at a time and if that doesn't work pull it, that's what I was thinking the easiest road first. It's a lot more fun flying it then working on it. lance |
Author: | Fraser MacPhee [ Mon Mar 31, 2014 2:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: motor mount |
Eggzackly! |
Author: | thorpdrvr [ Mon Mar 31, 2014 3:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: motor mount |
I have a 290 and replaced mine years back. I'm pretty sure the 08-03600 are the ones I used. They are dynafocal mounts, but all mount in a flat plane relative to one another so are real easy to change. Just take weight off engine with hoist, remove bolts and change them. If you have a little slack in the cables, might not have to undo anything. As they sag over time, I have put a couple washers under the bottom ones to shim it up. I'll check to verify the model when I get home on Wednesday. Bernie Fried N18XS |
Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |