I've mentioned my little theory on steering springs before. There weren't many comments, but I thought I saw some rolling eyes between the lines.
FWIW, in January I did a little experiment with the ACS so-called "compression" springs which came with MLM-P. In my humble opinion, they are a little stiff for my taste, so I wanted to see how stiff they actually were. They measured roughly 90 lb/in for spring rate, but interestingly they had A LOT of hysteresis.... basically because of the friction with the square wire bales that encapsulate the spring.
I also measured the hardware store tension springs that I bought for my taxi trials. The measured spring rate on those was about 14 lb/in, with no hysteresis that I could measure. I liked the feel of the softer springs much better, and maybe they were even a little on the soft and spongy side.
My theory is that there is an OPTIMUM spring stiffness for the T18 to get a good steering response whenever the tail is on the ground. Consider the extremes: First, no springs, just cables... I think everyone would agree that this configuration would be ... twitchy, to say the least. (Especially in a cross wind when the tailwheel touches. Ouch.) Now consider the other extreme: No cables, no springs, just the aerodynamics of the rudder to steer. I think we'd also agree that this would be a painfully unresponsive steering configuration. The best feel (which also has a subjective aspect) is somewhere in the middle. So, again, I think there is an optimum spring rate for steering springs, and in my no-thorp-time unqualified opinion, it is less than 90 lb/in.
Feel free to disagree.
Before I get comments regarding compression springs vs. tension springs, from the safety point of view.. not to worry, when I finally get MLM-P to an airworthy condition, I will make sure I address the problem of a broken spring somehow. I sure don't want to ever lose steering on a roll-out.
Cheers!
D
|