Attachment:
Scan0088.jpg [ 457.01 KiB | Viewed 12282 times ]
Sure makes R & R the wheel assembly easier . 
RB
| Thorp Air Command - T18.net http://t18.net/thorpforum/ |
|
| Cleveland/Parker wheel revision http://t18.net/thorpforum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=7903 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Rich Brazell [ Sat Mar 05, 2016 3:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Cleveland/Parker wheel revision |
Attachment: Scan0088.jpg [ 457.01 KiB | Viewed 12282 times ] Sure makes R & R the wheel assembly easier . RB
|
|
| Author: | jrevens [ Sat Mar 05, 2016 8:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Cleveland/Parker wheel revision |
How does it make it easier, Rich? |
|
| Author: | Rich Brazell [ Sat Mar 05, 2016 8:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Cleveland/Parker wheel revision |
You can put a socket on the "nut." If you need any further instructions I can type them up and send them to ya ! RB
|
|
| Author: | jrevens [ Sun Mar 06, 2016 2:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Cleveland/Parker wheel revision |
Rich Brazell wrote: You can put a socket on the "nut." If you need any further instructions I can type them up and send them to ya ! RB Ahh..."I see" said the blind man! I switched to that style nut a long time ago on my wheels. What I'm curious about now is why they specify a lower torque value compared to the AN365 nut. In my experience the all metal lock nuts have a higher "running torque" than the nylon lock nuts. The running torque is added to the specified torque to get your torque wrench setting of course. Regardless of that, it seems like the actual torque required to pre-load the bolts (the same bolts that have been used forever on these wheels) would still be the same - the bolts are the same. Maybe they decided after all these decades that those bolts & nuts were tighter than they need to be? Type your answer up & send it to me.
|
|
| Author: | Rich Brazell [ Sun Mar 06, 2016 11:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Cleveland/Parker wheel revision |
You funny man young grasshopper !  No need to send message as you have turned on the light and can now see the printed page !  RB
|
|
| Author: | fytrplt [ Sun Mar 06, 2016 1:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Cleveland/Parker wheel revision |
Could have used that info last week when I re-tired! |
|
| Author: | dickwolff [ Sun Mar 06, 2016 6:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Cleveland/Parker wheel revision |
About 35 years ago I ground the edge of a socket to a thin wall for this very reason. I still have it. Used it a couple of weeks ago when I put shiny new disks on. D |
|
| Author: | Bill Williams [ Sun Mar 06, 2016 6:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Cleveland/Parker wheel revision |
I use two Craftsman 1/4" drive sockets and ratchets out of the box, no modifications |
|
| Author: | Pilotjk [ Sun Mar 06, 2016 11:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Cleveland/Parker wheel revision |
I use snap on socket, no clearance issues |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|