Thorp Air Command - T18.net

Supporting Owners, Builders and Pilots of the Thorp T-18 and its variants.
It is currently Sun Dec 22, 2024 2:21 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
flyingfool
PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2016 1:08 pm 
Sr. Member
Sr. Member

Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2014 11:01 am
Posts: 226
Images: 7
I'm just curious if anyone would have an estimate of the weight savings of building the cowling and other "glass" parts out of carbon fiber instead of traditional fiberglass.

Really it comes down to the weight savings and how much more expensive is carbon fiber vs. traditional fiberglass if it is worth going the carbon fiber route.

Would carbon fiber hold in more heat inside the cowl than fiberglass? I know that aluminum cowl is the best alternative I think. But I'm not sure I have the skills required to construct a cowl out of aluminum. But carbon fiber and fiberglass appear to be the same sort of process albeit with different physical materials. That is cut the fiber, place in/on a mold and put on the proper resin. repeat with as many layers as necessary.

Many years ago at an EAA chapter meeting they made up a vacuumed bagged sandwiched product. It was for demonstration, but was a thin piece of foam which was sandwiched between an upper and lower fiberglass cloth. Added the resin and vacuumed bagged. The result was an amazingly stiff and VERY light panel. To the point that it makes me wonder if say the baggage floor and even side panels could be made the same way. Resulting in a very light and I presume durable panel that could have a light cloth contact cemented to it so the interior panels so made would be light and attractive. Has anyone tried such a process?


Top
 Profile Personal album  
 
dickwolff
PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2016 2:12 pm 
Sr. Member
Sr. Member

Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 7:40 pm
Posts: 500
Images: 6
Location: Canada
Data Point:
My glass cowl (old polyester resin, 4 piece, Cheeky Style, with scoop) weights 26 lb.

D


Top
 Profile Personal album  
 
Bill Williams
PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2016 2:29 pm 
I had a fiberglas poly resin cowl and made the aluminum. Weighed both for comparison and the Aluminum weighed 10 plus pounds less than fiberglas. Another interesting tidbit is the aluminum lowered the CHT temps about 50 degrees and the oil 10 degrees.


Top
  
 
flyingfool
PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2016 4:14 pm 
Sr. Member
Sr. Member

Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2014 11:01 am
Posts: 226
Images: 7
I knew that the aluminum would probably be much lighter. I also knew that the aluminum would conduct heat away better.

At least I have a data point now for the weight of a fiberglass cowling at 26 lbs.

What I don't have is an estimate as to what a carbon fiber cowling would weigh. If it is only like a pound and it costs a lot more money to make out of carbon, it wouldn't make sense I don't think.

I know that fiberglass is a very poor conductor of heat. What I don't know is if carbon fiber is any different than fiberglass.

I'd LOVE to have an aluminum cowl. But they are about as rare as hen's teeth and those who have them would probably not ever part with them. At least not without a kings ransom. And it seems that the skills to make the cowl out of aluminum is an art more than anything. And I'm no artist!!!!


Top
 Profile Personal album  
 
Bill Williams
PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2016 6:35 pm 
They're easy to make, just make it look like the picture
Carbon is expensive, glas would be fine used with epoxy and not poly resin


Top
  
 
SHIPCHIEF
PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2016 7:39 pm 
Sr. Member
Sr. Member

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2011 9:05 pm
Posts: 471
Location: USA
I have a chipmunk cheek polyester fiberglass cowl. It is heavy, oil soaked, and rubbery. Quarter turn fasteners have ripped out on the bottom of the left cheek.
The "Ram Air' scoop and filter assembly are horrible.
I'm thinking about replacing the bottom skin, which seems the simplest to fabricate in aluminum, and going forward from there. That will also let me try something different for the air inlet.
I think the original cheek cowl is a good design, so I just need to work up my skill level.

_________________
Scott Emery
EAA Chapter 326
T-18 N18TE


Top
 Profile  
 
dickwolff
PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2016 7:52 pm 
Sr. Member
Sr. Member

Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 7:40 pm
Posts: 500
Images: 6
Location: Canada
Scott - if your cowl is that far gone, and you don't mind glass, consider a whole new set from Cubes. I've seen what he sells and they are really high quality. They also have a joggle around the opening now which stiffens up the edge.

Maybe Cubes can get a weight for you, but they would almost certainly be lighter than mine. His are epoxy and well made. Mine are polyester and they were very generous with the resin.

DW


Top
 Profile Personal album  
 
James Grahn
PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2016 11:13 pm 
Hero Member
Hero Member

Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 7:16 pm
Posts: 1462
Images: 0
Location: USA
In fact, I picked up two new cowls this week. Yes they are excellent quality. Our fiberglass is finally being done by a professional shop.
Cubes


Top
 Profile Personal album  
 
ljkrume
PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2016 2:04 pm 
Sr. Member
Sr. Member

Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 1:33 pm
Posts: 232
Images: 213
Location: USA
Talking about fiberglass cowls going bad: one of the best suggestions I got somewhere was to paint it glossy on the inside. That can't amount to too much weight. I only sanded it a little and didn't make a big effort. Paint repels the oil and makes it easier to wipe clean. We all know it's going to get dripped on some time or other, it adds up and may eventually make fiberglass soft. Anything you can do with doublers or extra material around the fasteners will help for long term wear too.

Les Krumel - FLYING!
Albuquerque


Top
 Profile Personal album  
 
Jwsteele1981
PostPosted: Sun Aug 30, 2020 9:28 pm 
Newbie
Newbie

Joined: Mon May 11, 2020 7:46 pm
Posts: 8
Cubes / or anyone... using non cheeked cowl.. I ave one i bought with my project, Wondering pros or cons between cheeked and non cheeked cowls. Speed/weight.?


Top
 Profile  
 
Jeff J
PostPosted: Mon Aug 31, 2020 6:19 am 
Sr. Member
Sr. Member

Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 8:18 am
Posts: 584
Images: 0
Location: eastern OK
I don’t think I have ever seen a cheeked cowl in person but I haven’t been able to attend any of the gatherings. Mine is original style as was the two that I have seen that have passed through here. My upper cowl is aluminum and quite a bit lighter than the lower fiberglass cowl.

_________________
Thorp T18
O-320-B3B (160 HP)
68x74 Sterba Propeller

"The joke in aviation is, 'If you want to make a million, you'd better start with £10m.' " -Bruce Dickinson


Top
 Profile Personal album  
 
jrevens
PostPosted: Mon Aug 31, 2020 8:07 pm 
Sr. Member
Sr. Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 10:13 pm
Posts: 789
Location: USA
Jeff J wrote:
I don’t think I have ever seen a cheeked cowl in person but I haven’t been able to attend any of the gatherings. Mine is original style as was the two that I have seen that have passed through here. My upper cowl is aluminum and quite a bit lighter than the lower fiberglass cowl.


I believe that the original was a "cheeked" cowl. It is a great design, and the 2-piece cowls are much less prevalent on Thorps.

_________________
John Evens
Arvada, Colorado

T-18 N71JE (sold)
Kitfox 7 SS N27JE


Top
 Profile  
 
fytrplt
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2020 2:49 am 
Hero Member
Hero Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 8:07 pm
Posts: 1153
Images: 2
Location: Lakeland, Florida, USA
My metal cowl is one pound lighter than the fiberglass one it replaced.

_________________
Bob Highley
N711SH
SN 835
KLAL


Top
 Profile Personal album  
 
Jeff J
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2020 8:46 am 
Sr. Member
Sr. Member

Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 8:18 am
Posts: 584
Images: 0
Location: eastern OK
jrevens wrote:
Jeff J wrote:
I don’t think I have ever seen a cheeked cowl in person but I haven’t been able to attend any of the gatherings. Mine is original style as was the two that I have seen that have passed through here. My upper cowl is aluminum and quite a bit lighter than the lower fiberglass cowl.


I believe that the original was a "cheeked" cowl. It is a great design, and the 2-piece cowls are much less prevalent on Thorps.


Is this one considered a cheek cowl? download/file.php?id=2477&mode=view

If it is then I stand corrected. It is the only style I have seen in person (4 airplanes- I had forgotten about the one based at Vinita).

_________________
Thorp T18
O-320-B3B (160 HP)
68x74 Sterba Propeller

"The joke in aviation is, 'If you want to make a million, you'd better start with £10m.' " -Bruce Dickinson


Top
 Profile Personal album  
 
jrevens
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2020 1:05 pm 
Sr. Member
Sr. Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 10:13 pm
Posts: 789
Location: USA
Jeff J wrote:
jrevens wrote:
Jeff J wrote:
I don’t think I have ever seen a cheeked cowl in person but I haven’t been able to attend any of the gatherings. Mine is original style as was the two that I have seen that have passed through here. My upper cowl is aluminum and quite a bit lighter than the lower fiberglass cowl.


I believe that the original was a "cheeked" cowl. It is a great design, and the 2-piece cowls are much less prevalent on Thorps.


Is this one considered a cheek cowl? download/file.php?id=2477&mode=view

If it is then I stand corrected. It is the only style I have seen in person (4 airplanes- I had forgotten about the one based at Vinita).


That looks like a Ratray cowl. They were relatively popular, but heavy compared to the original, & (I believe) most popular cowl design seen on T-18s. You can call it a “cheek” cowl if you want to, I suppose, but the original cowl designed by John Thorp, is a 4-piece cowl. The “cheeks” are easily removed individually for pre-flight inspections, etc.

_________________
John Evens
Arvada, Colorado

T-18 N71JE (sold)
Kitfox 7 SS N27JE


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron

[ Time : 0.120s | 11 Queries | GZIP : On ]