I 'won' a new O-290G crankcase on 'epay' last week. I called DIVCO about boring it to accept O-320 cylinders, they charge $200 for that service. However, the person to whom I was speaking said some O-290g cases are too thin and prone to cracking when bored for O-320 cylinders. Modern O-290 pistons save the day!
I asked if there was a way to adapt the single sleeve bearing to the nose of the case in lieu of the two standard main bearings; he said 'no'. I didn't want a constant speed prop anyway...but a little more stability in this area wouldn't hurt.
I have another O-290g case, which has been bored (poorly) for conical mounts. I check it periodically when I think of O-290 upgrades and mods. It was taken from a T-18 that had sat un-flown too long and the steel parts had some rust.
One of the advantages of the O-290G, O-235 and early O-290 mechanical tappet engine case is a set of catch basins along the tappet guides that collect oil thrown off the crankshaft. This oil drains through drilled passages into the pushrod tubes, and over the top of the head where it carries away heat and lubricates the valve stems.
I wonder if adding these catch basins and drillings would improve an O-320 or O-360 case. Just a life extending mod for the engine. Kinda like Ney Nozzles for cam life, or piston cooling jets, or oil cooling tubes to the exhaust valve guides like used on Helicopter engines.
http://occonline.occ.cccd.edu/online/rf ... appets.PDFThis link describes the problems Lycoming has experienced with hydraulic tappets over the years, and some efforts to correct them. It's a little antagonistic, but a good read.