Jeff J wrote:
The "drain valve" pictured is at the front so, unless that tank is tapered or mounted so the existing drain is at the lowest point when the aircraft is parked, it located at the highest point on the tank floor... i.e. it can't be used for a valid sump check. My turtle deck has a 2.1 degree down slope to the rear when the aircraft is parked which would put this tank outlet about 5/8 of an inch above the lowest point. Using the numbers above, that would be close to 1.25 gallons of space sitting below the outlet. In flight, the outlet would pretty much become the lowest point but it would be difficult to do a sump check in flight.
My fix would be to move the outlet to the rear and install a gascolator on the floor to trap any contamination. That takes care of 2 problems: 1) sump checks and 2) gives a low point in the system that the hoses can drain to. Essentially, I would duplicate what I have seen on Cessna and Piper aircraft and follow the "rules" for fuel system design published by people like Tony Bingelis.
You're right of course, Jeff. Can anyone confirm that the T-18 usually flies in an attitude that has the turtle deck sloping slightly nose down? In 28 years of flying mine, I don't think I ever had a reason to check or think about that. Anyway, this aux. tank's feed is going to be joining the fuel line to the engine upstream of the existing gascolator, which should trap any water, but that doesn't address your concern about getting a valid sample directly from that tank before flight.
I helped build an "under-the-turtle deck tank" like this with another builder years ago. It had a tapered shape (deeper at the rear), with a small "sump". I don't recall if it had any provision for taking a fuel sample. I do remember it held about 8 gallons, and worked well.