Thorp Air Command - T18.net

Supporting Owners, Builders and Pilots of the Thorp T-18 and its variants.
It is currently Sun Dec 22, 2024 4:40 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
Tim06A
 Post subject: Pitot static placement
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 6:38 am 
Newbie
Newbie

Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2011 2:46 pm
Posts: 10
Location: USA
Hey Gang,
We recently bought an older T-18 (N312LL). The VSI, Altimeter and Airspeed indicator seem to be very erratic. The static ports are on the pitot tube. I'm thinking that is not the correct placement. Where has everyone found to be the best spot for the static port.
Thanks
Tim


Last edited by Anonymous on Fri Oct 07, 2011 6:38 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Rich Brazell
 Post subject: Pitot static placement
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 11:36 am 
Hero Member
Hero Member

Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 12:33 pm
Posts: 3108
Images: 64
Location: Jamul, CA (San Diego area)
Are you sure about the static port being on the pitot tube ? Some folks just vent from the back of the panel and that can cause "erratic" readings. If it is on the pitot tube I would also check the connections all the way to the instruments. There may be a common "T" than has a leak ? Doesn't take much.

I placed my flush static ports on the sides of the A/C. One on the left for the instruments and one on the right for the autopilot.

RB


Last edited by admin on Fri Oct 07, 2011 11:36 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Personal album  
 
Ryan Allen
 Post subject: Pitot static placement
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 5:56 pm 
Hero Member
Hero Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:10 pm
Posts: 1123
Images: 0
Location: Louisiana
I just chased a static leak for several hours before I switched the "T" out on the back of the instrument because I had run out of ideas of where the leak was coming from. It solved the problem. I still cant figure how it was leaking but it sure stopped it once I switched it out.


Last edited by Ryan Allen on Fri Oct 07, 2011 5:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Personal album  
 
Tim06A
 Post subject: Pitot static placement
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 6:44 pm 
Newbie
Newbie

Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2011 2:46 pm
Posts: 10
Location: USA
Yep thought about leaks too. I ran across an article that Lee sent me a while ago & re-read it. It was from the '80s and in reference to our plane specifically. It talked about the same problems we're still having. Makes me think the placement has been wrong from the beginning. I was thinking that side of fuse would be best. Just need to figure out exactly where.


Last edited by admin on Fri Oct 07, 2011 6:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Rich Brazell
 Post subject: Pitot static placement
PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 7:34 pm 
Hero Member
Hero Member

Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 12:33 pm
Posts: 3108
Images: 64
Location: Jamul, CA (San Diego area)
Now that I think back when I did my pitot static system leak check (using a balloon/modeling clay and a large syringe) I did find (2) leaks on the back of 2 instruments where the nylon fittings screwed in. I applied a little EZ turn to the threads and problem solved. When I had the pitot/static system ground checked for the transponder Mode C, he ran a leak check using one of those very expensive black boxes and it was a very tight system.

RB


Last edited by admin on Fri Oct 07, 2011 7:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Personal album  
 
Rich Brazell
 Post subject: Pitot static placement
PostPosted: Sat Oct 08, 2011 8:27 am 
Hero Member
Hero Member

Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 12:33 pm
Posts: 3108
Images: 64
Location: Jamul, CA (San Diego area)
Try the Thorplist Archives and search static port location.

RB


Last edited by admin on Sat Oct 08, 2011 8:27 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Personal album  
 
hurant
 Post subject: Pitot static placement
PostPosted: Sat Oct 08, 2011 5:48 pm 
Newbie
Newbie

Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 7:45 pm
Posts: 36
Location: USA
The side mounted static lines are supposed to be connected to balance out side slips, etc.


Last edited by admin on Sat Oct 08, 2011 5:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
bfinney
 Post subject: Pitot static placement
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2011 11:13 am 
Sr. Member
Sr. Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 2:24 pm
Posts: 504
Images: 6
Location: Yelm, WA USA
According to my news letter index the following have articales on the static ports (news letter-page no.):
19-3, 44-4, 61-5, 91-9, 100-17, 105-10

Of this list I only have 91, it has a drawing on how to position the static ports on the side of the fuselage. I have not verified it but I believe my static ports are farther aft than what is shown in the drawing.

_________________
Bruce Finney
N18JF T-18C #262
Yelm, WA USA


Last edited by admin on Sun Oct 09, 2011 11:13 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Personal album  
 
stug
 Post subject: Pitot static placement
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2011 1:07 pm 
Sr. Member
Sr. Member

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 2:20 am
Posts: 158
Images: 0
Location: Australia
A few Australian T18s have their static ports located further aft than the position indicated in the newsletters with apparent good results. My other post on the topic of side skins had a drawing showing the static location.
Stuart

_________________
Stug


Last edited by admin on Sun Oct 09, 2011 1:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Personal album  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron

[ Time : 0.120s | 12 Queries | GZIP : On ]