Interesting back and forth I had with Sensenich yesterday/today (starts at the bottom)
Lee:
I am familiar with Santa Monica Propeller, but not Sandy?
I guess my main concern, certified aircraft or not (although, I do admit that I thought the Thorp T18 was certified?), is that the propeller 76EM is not suitable to be cutback, or pitched that highly and run on the O-360 engine. If further testing was done by Sandy, or Santa Monica Propeller, we can not support it.
Perhaps Ed Zercher, who worked here since the dawn of time (smile) but retired last year might be aware of it.
Happy flying!
Denise
Denise,
Sorry, that was a misprint I meant Sandy Friezner, he has long been a respected propeller vibration engineer (he may have passed on). We are not talking about certified aircraft here so STC's and or type certificates do not apply.
I understand your position, look back and you will see that Sensenichs' official position was that the 76EM cut down to 68" was perfectly acceptable for engines up to the 0-320 back in the 70's/80's. As far as the 0-360 goes, you are correct, Sensenich did not approve that prop officially for use on that engine but as I said after the vibration analysis was done by Sandy Friezner at Specialized Testing Srevice and or Santa Monica Propeller numerous T-18's including Don Taylor's round Round the world T-18 (now hanging in the EAA museum) used this prop (in fact the exact prop dimensionally Dick originally contacted you about)
I won't take any more of you time, I do thank you for what I've already taken. Sincerely,
Lee Walton
Lee:
I stand my statement that using a 76EM8 series cutback 8
_________________ Lee Walton Houston, TX N51863,N118LW KEFD
Last edited by Anonymous on Wed Oct 13, 2010 11:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
|